Last year (as early as January) I had an entry about how I liked Star Trek - mentioning what's so good about it. At about that time, there was hardly any news about anything Trek related, and I'm sure I shared some form of frustration with other Trek fans about how this missing genre piece was a blow to the Science Fiction world.Was it disinterest that did this? Hardly - I would like to think that it was the general direction set by the producers of Trek, and the not too keen writing they dished out for the episodes. They even tried a retcon (of sorts) with the creation of Enterprise (carefully keeping mum on Star Trek, per se... and presenting a less perfect world where Humans were still being treated by Vulcans with mistrust or condescension.
Well the series seemed to be exciting at times, yet these exciting ways were still a far cry from the intellectually stimulating stories of a franchise that had seen better days. Still... even when they decided to stop Trek production altogether, I had hopes of watching even some movie or direct to TV special, updating what we know of Trek.
Maybe I was not the only one doing the wishing... Paramount, not really wanting to release the franchise so others could try producing it, opted for a Trek film... number XI it should seem, and would bring back the focus to Kirk, Spock and McCoy.
But wait, Deforest Kelly (who played Dr. McCoy) has long since been gone from this world (soon followed by James Doohan - who played Scotty), so how would this pass muster?
Answer... it would be a retelling (of sorts) of Trek's crew for the U.S.S. Enterprise (NCC-1701) . Yes it would have Kirk and company - but stepping into these characters shoes would be a new generation of actors (and actresses).
After all, if the roles of Batman and Superman can be handled by many faces (albeit, not at once) why not Trek? But the produces know that Trek has always had a strong fanbase - some would say, bordering on zealousness - so they (the production people) were probably cautious, not wanting to anger such loyal fans. So how did they make the announcement?
They started by announcing the plans to do a movie - based on the characters of Kirk and co. When fans did not protest, they started searching for people they could include in the cast. How fares the names of the people connected to the film? For starters, the seemingly most recognized actor amongst them (by way of Lord of the Rings) is playing the good Doctor McCoy, a known actor - thankfully recognized for his role as a villain in Heroes the TV show, will play the famous Vulcan (as portrayed in the past by Leonard Nimoy) and a relatively new actor will be playing Kirk (or at least, relatively new to me - recognition-wise).
How do I feel about this? I'm glad there's a new initiative to start (revive) the franchise, but like many fans apparently, I'll be reserving the right to either love them, or hate them - after I've seen the movie. After all, if being a Trek fan has taught me anything, it's to be very patient. Until then "Live Long and Prosper"
