As the recent election proved to many, the Marcos era is far from over, and to anyone who thinks otherwise, you just need to see how Senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr. (a.k.a. Bong bong) is so close to claiming the Vice-presidency of the Philippines - in fact, he was leading in the first few hours of the unofficial count. Though that does not seem to be the case for now, as his opponent, Representative Leni Robredo is leading him by a mere 200,000+ votes. So yes, this battle is far from over.
For people who've lived through the Martial Law days and were highly active in the Years of Living Dangerously (which culminated in the EDSA revolution, leading to the ouster of Ferdinand Jr.'s father and exiling their family to Hawaii) must really be scratching their heads wondering what would have brought about this kind of 'horrific' result. That's Incredible. How could this be? How could so many vote for Marcos? Have we not learned from the past? What happened to "Never Again"?
Simply put it stems from many people thinking that as bad as it is being drawn out to be, it seems that the Marcos years have been packaged and presented as the golden years of Philippine development. Case in point, the citing of how many infrastructure projects there were, and how life "seemed" better during these years. The target of this image-building seems to be the youth of today. I mean, aside from the votes of the traditionally Solid North that has the propensity to vote for a local son (or daughter) who hails from their region, what is surprising, and down right disturbing, is Mr. Marcos's strong showing in Metro Manila.
EDSA (the movement) has been an utter disappointment. So many promises unfulfilled. 30 years later... are we better off? Has life been better? Why are we experiencing so many problems and so many frustrations?
I suspect that if we looked at the demographics, many of these voters are from the relatively young sector - those who never experienced Martial Law, and who probably believe the talk that life was indeed better during the Marcos years. I mean, let's face it... there have been a scattering of posts in Social Media about how good life was in the Marcos era. How decisive a leader he was, how they got a lot of things done during the strong man's rule.
Having a seeming wishy washy, confused, out of touch and weak President, as Noynoy's image seems to invoke - some due to his fault, exacerbates this comparison. The Marcos spin doctors have been laying the groundwork of the lies for years. We sometimes encounter such posts, heaping praises on Ferdinand Marcos' rule, and counter it with posts that remind everyone else of the abuses, and the situation the Philippines was in - as Ferdinand (the father) helped make us into the 'sick man of Asia'.
These youths are regaled with how much the Peso-Dollar exchange was back then, though these articles again forget to state that the reason these exchange rates ballooned, resulting to a much weaker peso. We again counter and say it was because of the Kleptocracy - a word invented to describe the Marcos plunder of the country's coffers. Another phrase invented? The Conjugal Dictatorship.
The thing is, part of the reason these spins are very successful because decades after Martial Law and all it's abuses, we've yet to see a full blown museum of how the Marcos years adversely affected us. Nor are there historical lessons taught to drive home the horrors of the victims. Instead, the youth see the current problems and criticize the government freely (an action that would land them in jail, tortured or killed in the Martial law days). You might say they are spoiled with he freedom earned by their parents or grandparents.But are ignorant as to how much the previous generations sacrificed for this freedom to criticize. Oh yeah, and they cleverly mention the fact that 'if all these stories are real' where's the proof? Why aren't the Marcoses convicted?
We did not see, therefore pay heed to the well orchestrated moves to repaint history, and may well pay for it with the return of the Marcoses to power. They've been stretching their muscles up north for years now... from being Governors to Congressional Representatives to the Senate, and now... quite possibly, a heartbeat away from Malacanang. We've become too 'careful', too 'civilized', too 'complacent'. It's our faults that he youth look up to a possible Marcos Presidency with hope.
If indeed the youth have voted in strength to support Marcos this past election, then time will definitely be on Bong bong's side. Six years from now, who's to say he won't aspire for the Presidency? Believe me... he will. I won't be surprised if many are telling him that it will be is destiny.
The Solid North has never had a candidate with so much political clout - a mixture of past, present and future loyalties and connections from people who feel that their lives a much better with a Marcos in power,. Some might even remember a more comfortable life. You think this is a fluke? Let's just take a look at how much better the roads in Ilocos Norte (where the Marcoses are from) are. Say what you want about them, but Marcos believed in taking care of their backyard; their constituency, and many old people - not just Northerners, mind you, look kindly to the Marcos years as having a better life.
For many a simple folk, they saw Marcos as a competent leader, someone to emulate to the point that children even tried copying his speaking style - complete with the assertive pauses he is known for. Others might point out that this was because he was extemporaneous - and that is true, the man was a genius and could memorize his speech when needed. A bar topnotcher and (if the stories are to be believed - and many do believe) a be-medaled war hero. I mean, if we compared him to our past leaders, few would possibly stand up to his credentials (Miriam Defensor-Santiago could, though she had not had the chance to lead us to prove this). And this is the problem.
These spinners of tales focus in on the early years, when Martial Law was first declared and many even thought, 'finally, we'll see some discipline and change', but this viewpoint sweeps away the latter years - the times when the International Community was ostracizing an ailing Marcos' rule, when the International Monetary Fund was getting wary of lending the country more money, and the Philippine's continued credit access was hinged on the bitter pill of a snap election. One that was forced upon him because of the questionable handling of a Fact-finding and seemingly farce investigation to the assassination of his major thorn, Benigno Aquino Jr. How bad were we in? How deep was our problem? Look to Greece these days... that should give you a hint.
The Aquino murder was too visible, too daring a crime to hide or sweep aside as a domestic problem. How did they think they could get away with it? Prior to the Aquino assassination were a whole lot of abuses to people less prominent than Ninoy, one that Martial Law was able to hide. We got to learn a lot about them post EDSA revolution, but ask anyone in the streets if they have a good idea of how bad it was, and hardly anyone will be able to say, or even quantify it. It was just too mind boggling... both in it's scale, it's cruelty, and now... in how it has not been taught to the youth.
We come up with clever phrases like "Never Again", but are just not caring enough to ensure the experience is shared - the lessons are not being taught. Japan has properly documented their experience with Hirosima and Nagasaki's bombing; and people who enter the museum come out with a stark idea of the horrors that they - the Japanese people faced. Us? We had an interactive museum... but only for the duration of the EDSA 30th anniversary, and after that... well, nada.
Is it any surprise that few young people remember or know? Are we so forgiving? or just plain short in remembering? are we in denial? Are we too sensitive or fearful to speak the truth because the Marcoses are still influential? One nice video the tI recently saw was how several young people were asked by old people about how they perceived the Martial Law years, and these youths pointed out that they liked it for what it gave the country. Stability, discipline, growth in infrastructure - then the old people introduced themselves as Martial Law victims and explained whet happened to them. these youths felt emotional, realizing how flawed their perception of the Marcos years were. It was a strong video... but I don't know how many young people watched and understood it. For brevity's sake, the stories were not told in their painful completion. So people are left to wonder... what exactly was shared to elicit such a reaction? We need more of these to reach more people - in a conniving way.
We cannot change how people up North may perceive the Marcoses. Loyalty, unfortunately, trumps History... remember that.
But the North isn't all of the Philippines. The Metro area, where the nations's leading Universities can be found, is not doing anything to teach lessons learned in the recent past. The government has been inutile in ensuring such lessons are taught, much less, remembered.
Because of that, we're all about to suffer from Martial Law Alzheimers, as most participants of said era age, die and wither to forgetfulness. Meanwhile, the Marcos machinery is patiently biding it's time to put a Marcos back into Malacanang. Bong bong is possibly now just one heartbeat away - and many people seem more than willing to make sure his path is clear towards that goal.
We say it will be a slap to our international image if a Marcos wins in the elections... but we're all talk, and no action - just like a lot of politicians we so despise.
Then we raise the alarm when we see this happening?
Methinks it's time to stop being reactive, and someone should start making sure lessons from the past are not forgotten.
Borrowing a phrase that a favorite journalist of mine, 'Here's the rub' - It may already be too late. We're playing catch up against a well oiled, clearly organized, image-making machine. And I don't really know if we'll be getting any help from the incoming government, I wouldn't cont on it - more so if Marcos Jr. is it's Vice President.
So,,, in six years... fearless forecast? Bong bong will have a really good chance to be President. If you want this - by all means, wait patiently. If you don't want this, what are you going to do about it?
Update - November 2023:
Ferdinand Bongbong Marcos has been the President of the Phipippne Republic for almost a year and a half now. The above article proved prophetic. Through some savvy political advancement, the Marcos and Duterte factions formed a formidable political machinery, and candidate Atty. Leni Robredo and followers realized that integrity does not count in seeking votes. Marcos and company won in an overwhelming landslide - though there may be some questionable practices by the COMELEC, it is just plain reality that said voting body was mostly appointees of the Dutertes.
However, Bongbong has proven that he doesn't want to be recognized as a strong man, and is willing to keep things running ina democratic manner. Unfortunately, cronyism (that returned in Duterte's time) is back to full swing... they're not just making it too glaring, unlike the previous administration. So there's that.
Ferdinand Bongbong Marcos has been the President of the Phipippne Republic for almost a year and a half now. The above article proved prophetic. Through some savvy political advancement, the Marcos and Duterte factions formed a formidable political machinery, and candidate Atty. Leni Robredo and followers realized that integrity does not count in seeking votes. Marcos and company won in an overwhelming landslide - though there may be some questionable practices by the COMELEC, it is just plain reality that said voting body was mostly appointees of the Dutertes.
However, Bongbong has proven that he doesn't want to be recognized as a strong man, and is willing to keep things running ina democratic manner. Unfortunately, cronyism (that returned in Duterte's time) is back to full swing... they're not just making it too glaring, unlike the previous administration. So there's that.
































